Model Registry and Governance: Managing Thousands of AI Models in Production

Updated December 11, 2025

December 2025 Update: MLflow positioned as foundational MLOps element in 2025 industry roadmaps. Databricks extending MLflow Model Registry with Unity Catalog for centralized governance and cross-workspace collaboration. Regulated industries (finance, healthcare, pharma) requiring demonstrable GDPR, HIPAA, SOX compliance for AI model lifecycle.

Databricks extends MLflow's Model Registry by integrating with Unity Catalog, enabling centralized governance with fine-grained access control and cross-workspace collaboration.¹ The integration allows organizations to register models once and access them across multiple Databricks workspaces, creating unified model governance spanning development, staging, and production environments. As enterprises scale from experimental AI projects to production deployments numbering thousands of models, the infrastructure supporting model lifecycle management becomes as critical as the compute infrastructure training those models.

Industry roadmaps for MLOps in 2025 consistently position MLflow as a foundational element of the modern AI ecosystem.² The maturation reflects hard lessons from organizations that deployed AI models without governance infrastructure, discovering too late that compliance requirements, audit trails, and version control matter as much for models as for traditional software. Regulated industries including financial services, healthcare, and pharmaceuticals face particular pressure, with requirements like GDPR, HIPAA, and SOX demanding demonstrable control over how data flows through AI systems.³

Model registry fundamentals

A model registry provides a centralized repository managing the lifecycle of machine learning models from development through deployment to retirement.⁴ The registry functions as version control for models, tracking every artifact, parameter, and metadata element across the model lifecycle.

Core registry capabilities

Model versioning tracks changes across training iterations, hyperparameter tuning, and architecture modifications.⁵ Each version captures the complete state needed to reproduce the model, including code, dependencies, data references, and training configuration. The version history enables rollback when production issues emerge and comparison when evaluating improvements.

Metadata management attaches descriptive information to models and versions. Metadata includes training metrics, validation results, data lineage, ownership information, and deployment status. Rich metadata enables discovery, comparison, and compliance reporting across model portfolios.

Artifact storage maintains the actual model files, weights, and associated assets. Storage must handle diverse model formats, from PyTorch checkpoints through TensorFlow SavedModels to ONNX exports. Versioned artifact storage ensures that deployment pipelines access exactly the intended model version.

Stage management

Model stages represent positions in the deployment lifecycle. Common stages include development, staging, and production, though organizations customize stages for their workflows.⁶ Stage transitions require explicit actions, creating audit trails documenting when and why models moved between stages.

Staging environments enable validation before production deployment. Models promoted to staging undergo integration testing, performance validation, and compliance checks. The staging gate catches issues that unit tests and offline evaluation miss.

Production stage designation identifies models actively serving predictions. Production models receive monitoring attention and require change control procedures before updates. Clear production designation prevents confusion about which model version serves live traffic.

Governance infrastructure

Governance extends beyond versioning to encompass access control, audit trails, compliance documentation, and policy enforcement.

Access control models

Role-based access control restricts model operations to authorized personnel.⁷ Data scientists may create and modify development models while only designated reviewers can approve production promotions. The separation of duties prevents unauthorized deployment and supports compliance requirements.

Fine-grained permissions control access at the model, version, and operation level. Some organizations restrict who can view model architectures as intellectual property while allowing broader access to inference endpoints. Granular controls balance collaboration needs against protection requirements.

Cross-workspace access enables organizations with multiple development environments to share models centrally. Unity Catalog integration provides this capability in Databricks environments, eliminating model duplication across workspaces while maintaining consistent access policies.⁸

Audit and lineage

Complete audit trails record every action affecting models, including creation, modification, promotion, and deletion.⁹ Audit logs capture who performed each action, when, and with what parameters. The records support incident investigation, compliance audits, and pattern analysis.

Data lineage tracks relationships between models and their training data. Understanding which datasets trained which models enables impact assessment when data quality issues emerge. Lineage documentation proves essential for GDPR data subject requests requiring identification of all processing involving specific data.

Model lineage extends tracking to model relationships, capturing parent-child relationships from transfer learning, distillation, or ensembling. The relationships affect compliance status: a model distilled from a problematic parent inherits compliance concerns requiring remediation.

Compliance integration

Regulated industries require documented compliance with specific frameworks. Healthcare AI must demonstrate HIPAA compliance in data handling.¹⁰ Financial services models face model risk management requirements under SR 11-7 and similar regulations. EU deployments must address AI Act requirements for high-risk systems.

Registry infrastructure supports compliance through structured documentation, approval workflows, and evidence collection. Compliance officers need access to model information without requiring data science expertise. Well-designed registries provide compliance-appropriate views of model status and documentation.

Automated compliance checking validates models against policy requirements before stage transitions. Checks might verify documentation completeness, bias testing completion, or security scanning results. Automated gates ensure consistent compliance enforcement without manual bottlenecks.

MLOps integration

Model registries integrate with broader MLOps infrastructure, connecting training pipelines, deployment systems, and monitoring platforms.

CI/CD pipeline integration

Support for webhooks and automated registry events enables seamless integration with CI/CD pipelines, approval processes, and alerting systems.¹¹ Stage transitions can trigger automated testing, deployment workflows, or notification chains. The integration enables continuous delivery for ML models with appropriate governance gates.

Teams gain tighter oversight when promoting models from experimentation to staging and production, ensuring every action remains tracked and governed.¹² The traceability supports both operational excellence and compliance requirements. Automated pipelines execute consistently while maintaining the audit trails manual processes often lose.

Git integration connects model registry events with source control systems. Model training code, configuration, and registry entries link together, enabling reconstruction of any historical model state. The integration supports reproducibility requirements central to scientific ML practices.

Deployment orchestration

Model registries serve as the source of truth for deployment systems. Deployment pipelines pull specified model versions from the registry rather than from ad-hoc storage locations. Centralized registry access prevents deployment of unauthorized or outdated models.

Canary and blue-green deployment patterns require coordination between registry and inference infrastructure. The registry tracks which versions serve which traffic percentages, enabling progressive rollout with automated rollback if metrics degrade. Deployment orchestration through the registry ensures consistency across serving infrastructure.

Multi-environment deployment from a single registry prevents version drift between environments. The same model version deploys identically to development, staging, and production inference endpoints. Environment-specific configuration applies through deployment parameters rather than model modifications.

Monitoring integration

Production model monitoring generates signals requiring registry integration. Performance degradation may indicate retraining needs or deployment issues. Monitoring systems that understand model versions can attribute issues to specific deployments and trigger appropriate responses.

Registry-aware monitoring enables automatic alerting when models approach end-of-life dates or performance thresholds. Proactive notifications prevent issues rather than requiring reactive incident response. The integration shifts operations from reactive to proactive model management.

A/B test results flow back to registries, annotating versions with production performance data. The annotations inform future model selection and development priorities. Closed-loop feedback from production to development accelerates model improvement cycles.

Scaling considerations

Organizations with hundreds or thousands of production models face scaling challenges beyond individual model management.

Portfolio management

Model portfolios require aggregate views beyond individual model status. Portfolio dashboards show overall compliance status, version currency, and performance distribution across all models. Executive stakeholders need portfolio-level information rather than model-by-model details.

Model catalogs enable discovery across large portfolios. Data scientists building new applications should discover existing models addressing similar problems before starting from scratch. Good catalog metadata and search capabilities prevent redundant development and promote model reuse.

Retirement workflows manage model end-of-life, ensuring deprecated models leave production gracefully. Dependencies must migrate to replacement models before retirement completes. Retirement tracking prevents orphaned production deployments of unsupported models.

Multi-team coordination

Large organizations have multiple teams developing and deploying models. Coordination mechanisms prevent conflicts while enabling appropriate autonomy. Namespace organization, approval workflows, and communication channels support multi-team operation.

Shared components require special governance. Foundation models, embedding services, and common preprocessing components serve multiple downstream models. Changes to shared components require impact assessment across dependent models before deployment.

Center of excellence patterns provide governance expertise to distributed teams. The central team maintains registry infrastructure, defines policies, and supports compliance requirements. Distributed teams retain autonomy within governance frameworks the center of excellence establishes.

Infrastructure requirements

Model registry infrastructure must scale with portfolio size. Storage requirements grow with model count and version depth. Compute requirements scale with metadata indexing and search operations. Capacity planning should anticipate growth trajectories.

High availability requirements reflect registry criticality. If the registry becomes unavailable, deployment pipelines may fail and compliance processes stall. Production-grade registry deployments require redundancy, backup procedures, and disaster recovery capabilities.

Integration scalability addresses API throughput for automated workflows. CI/CD pipelines and monitoring systems may generate substantial API traffic. Rate limiting and capacity management prevent integration overload during peak activity.

Implementation approaches

Organizations implement model registry capabilities through purpose-built platforms, open-source tools, or custom development.

Commercial platforms

Databricks Unity Catalog provides integrated registry capabilities with enterprise governance features.¹³ The tight integration with Databricks compute and storage simplifies adoption for organizations already using the platform. Cross-workspace capabilities address enterprise-scale requirements.

Weights & Biases offers model registry integrated with experiment tracking and artifact management.¹⁴ The platform emphasizes developer experience and team collaboration. Integration with popular ML frameworks simplifies adoption.

Cloud provider offerings from AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud provide registry capabilities integrated with their ML platforms. The integration simplifies adoption for organizations committed to specific cloud ecosystems. Multi-cloud organizations may face challenges with provider-specific registries.

Open-source options

MLflow Model Registry provides core registry capabilities in an open-source package.¹⁵ Organizations can self-host MLflow or use managed offerings. The open architecture enables customization and integration with existing infrastructure.

Kubeflow Model Registry fills the gap between model experimentation and production activities in Kubernetes-native environments.¹⁶ The registry provides a single pane of glass for ML model developers to index and manage models, versions, and artifacts metadata. Kubernetes integration suits organizations with existing Kubernetes infrastructure.

Custom implementations may address requirements that existing tools don't meet. The development investment is substantial, and organizations should carefully evaluate build-versus-buy decisions. Most organizations benefit from existing tools rather than custom development.

Professional implementation support

Model registry implementation requires expertise spanning ML engineering, platform architecture, and governance frameworks. Most organizations benefit from professional implementation support accelerating deployment and avoiding common pitfalls.

Introl's network of 550 field engineers support organizations implementing ML infrastructure including model registry and governance systems.¹⁷ The company ranked #14 on the 2025 Inc. 5000 with 9,594% three-year growth, reflecting demand for professional infrastructure services.¹⁸

Enterprise deployments across 257 global locations require consistent governance practices regardless of geography.¹⁹ Introl manages deployments reaching 100,000 GPUs with over 40,000 miles of fiber optic network infrastructure, providing operational scale for organizations implementing governance across distributed AI operations.²⁰

Governance maturity progression

Organizations typically progress through governance maturity stages as AI portfolios grow.

Initial deployments focus on basic versioning and artifact management. The primary goal is preventing deployment confusion and enabling rollback. Governance overhead remains minimal to avoid impeding experimentation velocity.

Growing portfolios add access control and approval workflows. As more stakeholders interact with models, coordination mechanisms become necessary. The governance investment reflects increased organizational reliance on AI capabilities.

Mature programs implement comprehensive compliance frameworks, portfolio management, and continuous improvement processes. The governance infrastructure supports hundreds or thousands of models across multiple teams and use cases. The investment reflects AI's strategic importance to organizational operations.

Organizations should match governance investment to portfolio maturity rather than implementing enterprise-grade governance for experimental projects. Lightweight governance enables rapid experimentation while scaled governance supports production reliability. The governance architecture should evolve with organizational AI maturity.

References

---

SEO Elements

Squarespace Excerpt (159 characters): Databricks Unity Catalog enables cross-workspace model governance. Learn model registry architecture, MLOps integration, and compliance frameworks for production AI.

SEO Title (56 characters): Model Registry and Governance: MLOps for Production AI

SEO Description (154 characters): Manage thousands of AI models with model registry infrastructure. Cover versioning, governance, MLflow integration, and compliance for enterprise MLOps systems.

URL Slugs: - Primary: model-registry-governance-mlops-production-ai-2025 - Alt 1: mlops-model-registry-governance-enterprise-guide - Alt 2: ai-model-governance-registry-compliance-2025 - Alt 3: enterprise-model-registry-mlflow-databricks-guide

Key takeaways

For ML platform teams: - Databricks Unity Catalog: register models once, access across multiple workspaces with fine-grained access control - MLflow positioned as foundational MLOps element for 2025; webhooks and events enable CI/CD integration - Model lineage enables impact assessment when data quality issues emerge; GDPR requires tracing all processing

For compliance officers: - HIPAA, GDPR, SOX, AI Act all require demonstrable control over data flows through AI systems - Audit trails record who performed each action, when, and with what parameters - Automated compliance checking validates models against policies before stage transitions

For architects: - Stage management: development → staging → production with explicit transitions creating audit trails - Multi-team coordination requires shared component governance—changes to foundation models require impact assessment - High availability essential: if registry unavailable, deployment pipelines fail and compliance processes stall

For implementation teams: - Open source: MLflow Model Registry for comprehensive capabilities; Kubeflow for Kubernetes-native environments - Commercial: Databricks Unity Catalog, Weights & Biases, cloud-native registries (AWS, Azure, GCP) - Match governance investment to portfolio maturity—lightweight for experiments, scaled for production