Complete Guide to NVIDIA B200 vs GB200 Deployment: Power, Cooling, and ROI Analysis

Updated December 8, 2025

NVIDIA's Blackwell architecture splits into two deployment paths that force infrastructure teams to make million-dollar decisions. The B200 delivers 2.5x performance over H100 at similar power consumption.¹ The GB200 Grace-Blackwell Superchip provides 30x inference speed for large language models but demands entirely new infrastructure designs.² With Blackwell systems now shipping in volume and GB300 Blackwell Ultra entering production, organizations face critical infrastructure decisions.

December 2025 Update: GB200 NVL72 systems began shipping to major cloud providers (Microsoft, Oracle, AWS, Meta) in December 2024, with mass production ramping through Q2-Q3 2025. Supermicro announced full production availability of HGX B200 solutions in February 2025. Meanwhile, NVIDIA unveiled GB300 Blackwell Ultra at GTC 2025 (March), offering 50% more performance than GB200—with shipping starting in September 2025. B200 GPUs are now available on AWS and GCP, though Blackwell demand remains so strong that new orders face 12-month waitlists.

The semiconductor industry watches these deployments closely because they represent fundamentally different approaches to AI acceleration. Pure GPU acceleration (B200) competes against CPU-GPU integration (GB200) for workloads that will consume $2 trillion in compute resources by 2030.³ Early adopters report performance variations of 10x depending on workload characteristics, making the selection process critical for competitive positioning.

Jensen Huang calls Blackwell "the engine to power the new industrial revolution," yet NVIDIA offers two engines with radically different fuel requirements.⁴ Infrastructure teams must choose between evolutionary upgrades that leverage existing designs and revolutionary deployments that require complete facility redesigns. The decision determines not just performance metrics but organizational capability to compete in AI-driven markets.

Architectural differences drive deployment complexity

The B200 follows traditional GPU architecture with 208 billion transistors fabricated on TSMC's 4NP process.⁵ Each chip delivers 20 petaflops of FP4 compute, roughly 2.5 times the H100's performance while maintaining the same 700W thermal design power (TDP).⁶ Memory bandwidth reaches 8TB/s through HBM3e, solving the memory bottleneck that constrains current generation deployments. Infrastructure teams familiar with H100 deployments can transition to B200 with minimal facility modifications.

GB200 revolutionizes the compute paradigm by combining Grace CPU and Blackwell GPU on a single substrate. The CPU brings 72 Arm Neoverse V2 cores connected to the GPU through NVLink-C2C at 900GB/s bidirectional bandwidth.⁷ This eliminates the PCIe bottleneck that traditionally limits CPU-GPU communication to 64GB/s. The integration enables new programming models where CPU and GPU share memory coherently, eliminating data movement that consumes up to 30% of total system power in traditional architectures.⁸

Power consumption diverges dramatically between architectures. A single B200 maintains the 700W envelope that existing infrastructure supports. The GB200 Superchip consumes 1,200W for the combined CPU-GPU package, while the full GB200 NVL72 system draws 120kW per rack.⁹ Organizations must evaluate whether their power infrastructure can deliver 600 amps at 208V or requires complete electrical system upgrades to 480V distribution.

Cooling requirements follow power consumption patterns. B200 deployments work with existing rear-door heat exchangers rated for 50kW per rack. GB200 configurations demand liquid cooling to the chip, with coolant flow rates of 20 liters per minute at inlet temperatures below 30°C.¹⁰ Facilities designed for air cooling face $5-10 million retrofit costs per megawatt to support GB200 deployments.¹¹

Memory architecture determines workload suitability

B200's HBM3e configuration provides 192GB of high-bandwidth memory per GPU, triple the H100's capacity.¹² Eight-GPU HGX B200 systems offer 1.5TB of GPU memory, sufficient for most current large language models. Memory bandwidth reaches 8TB/s per GPU, enabling faster model serving and reducing inference latency by 40% compared to H100.¹³ The architecture excels at traditional GPU workloads: model training, batch inference, and parallel processing tasks.

GB200 transforms memory economics through unified CPU-GPU memory space. The Grace CPU contributes up to 960GB of LPDDR5X memory accessible by both processors at 546GB/s.¹⁴ Combined with GPU HBM3e, total system memory reaches 1.1TB per Superchip. Models that overflow GPU memory can spill to CPU memory without the 50x performance penalty of traditional CPU-GPU transfers. Memory-constrained workloads see 7x performance improvements when CPU memory prevents disk paging.¹⁵

Workload analysis reveals clear deployment patterns. Pure model training favors B200 configurations where every transistor focuses on matrix multiplication. The absence of CPU overhead means 15% more die area dedicated to tensor cores.¹⁶ Training runs complete faster and consume less power per epoch. Meta's Llama 3 training simulations show B200 clusters finishing 405B parameter training 23% faster than equivalent GB200 deployments.¹⁷

Inference workloads paint a different picture. GB200's CPU handles preprocessing, tokenization, and result formatting while the GPU processes the neural network. The architecture eliminates data movement between separate CPU and GPU servers, reducing total inference latency by 60%.¹⁸ OpenAI reports that GB200 deployments handle 30x more concurrent users than B200 configurations for ChatGPT-scale models.¹⁹ The CPU's presence enables sophisticated caching strategies impossible in pure GPU systems.

Network topology impacts cluster design

B200 maintains NVIDIA's established networking approach with 18 NVLink connections per GPU supporting 900GB/s bisection bandwidth.²⁰ Eight-GPU HGX B200 nodes connect through 400GbE or 800GbE InfiniBand, maintaining the network hierarchy that HPC architects understand. Existing InfiniBand deployments upgrade to support B200 through switch firmware updates and optical module replacements. The evolutionary path minimizes deployment risk and accelerates time to production.

GB200 NVL72 revolutionizes cluster architecture by connecting 72 Blackwell GPUs through fifth-generation NVLink at 1.8TB/s per GPU.²¹ The entire system functions as a single logical GPU with 13 petaflops of compute and 30TB of coherent memory.²² Traditional network boundaries dissolve as NVLink switches replace InfiniBand for intra-rack communication. The architecture requires complete network redesign but eliminates bottlenecks that limit strong scaling in distributed training.

Cable management becomes critical at GB200 scale. Each NVL72 rack requires over 2,000 cables for power, networking, and liquid cooling connections.²³ NVIDIA's reference design specifies exact cable lengths and routing paths to maintain signal integrity at 1.8TB/s speeds. Deviations from specified bend radius cause bit errors that trigger constant retraining, reducing effective bandwidth by up to 40%.²⁴ Introl's deployment teams spend 40% of installation time on cable management, using augmented reality systems to verify every connection meets specifications.

Network cost analysis favors B200 for incremental deployments. Organizations add B200 nodes to existing clusters without replacing network infrastructure. A 1,000-GPU B200 deployment requires $15-20 million in networking equipment.²⁵ Equivalent GB200 NVL72 systems need $30-40 million for NVLink switches and optical transceivers.²⁶ The premium pays for itself through superior scaling efficiency, but only for workloads that utilize the full system.

Power infrastructure determines feasibility

B200 deployments leverage existing power designs optimized for 35-50kW per rack. Standard 208V three-phase circuits deliver sufficient current through existing power distribution units (PDUs). Data centers allocate 6-8 racks per megawatt, maintaining power usage effectiveness (PUE) ratios below 1.3.²⁷ Facilities with H100 infrastructure support B200 through simple hardware swaps without electrical upgrades.

GB200 power requirements shatter traditional assumptions. The NVL72's 120kW rack demand exceeds most facilities' per-rack circuit breaker ratings. Power delivery requires 480V three-phase with 300-amp circuits, infrastructure typically reserved for industrial machinery.²⁸ Transformers, switchgear, and distribution panels need complete replacement. Upgrade costs reach $2-3 million per megawatt before considering utility capacity constraints.²⁹

Utility coordination becomes critical for GB200 deployments. A modest 100-rack GB200 installation consumes 12MW continuously, equivalent to 10,000 homes.³⁰ Power companies require 18-24 month lead times for transmission upgrades. Singapore's data center moratorium stems partly from GB200 power demands that would consume 5% of national electricity generation.³¹ Introl works with utility companies across our APAC coverage area to secure power allocations before infrastructure design begins.

Backup power systems face unprecedented challenges. Traditional uninterruptible power supplies (UPS) sized for 15-minute runtime become impractical at 120kW per rack. Battery rooms would occupy more space than the compute infrastructure they protect. Modern GB200 deployments use grid-interactive inverters with 30-second battery bridge to generator start, accepting higher risk for dramatic space and cost savings.³² The approach requires generators capable of accepting 100% load steps, technology that didn't exist five years ago.

Cooling architecture defines deployment options

B200 cooling follows established patterns with flexibility for different approaches. Air cooling remains viable for low-density deployments under 35kW per rack. Rear-door heat exchangers handle 50kW configurations while maintaining cold aisle temperatures below 25°C.³³ Direct liquid cooling to cold plates enables 70kW densities for organizations willing to manage coolant distribution. The flexibility allows gradual infrastructure evolution as density requirements increase.

GB200 eliminates cooling flexibility in favor of maximum performance. NVIDIA's reference design mandates direct liquid cooling with strict specifications: 25°C inlet temperature, 20 liters per minute flow rate, and less than 10°C delta T across the cold plate.³⁴ Deviations trigger thermal throttling that reduces performance by up to 50%. The cooling system becomes as critical as the compute hardware itself.

Coolant selection impacts long-term operations. B200 deployments typically use facility water with corrosion inhibitors, leveraging existing building systems. GB200 requires engineered fluids with specific heat capacity above 4.0 kJ/kg·K and electrical resistivity exceeding 1 MΩ·cm.³⁵ The fluids cost $200-300 per gallon and require quarterly testing to maintain properties.³⁶ Contamination from a single leaking fitting can require complete system flush and refill at $500,000 cost.

Heat rejection determines geographic feasibility. B200's moderate heat density works with traditional cooling towers in most climates. GB200's extreme density requires advanced heat rejection approaching theoretical limits. Facilities in hot climates need hybrid cooling towers with evaporative assist, consuming 2-3 gallons of water per minute per rack.³⁷ Desert deployments become economically unfeasible when water costs exceed power costs. Northern European locations gain competitive advantage through free cooling that reduces GB200 operational costs by 30%.³⁸

Total cost of ownership reveals surprising economics

Capital expenditure comparisons favor B200 significantly. The GPU itself costs approximately $40,000, a 25% premium over H100's $32,000 street price.³⁹ Eight-GPU HGX B200 systems price around $400,000 complete. Infrastructure requirements match existing deployments, avoiding facility upgrade costs. A 1,000-GPU B200 deployment requires $45-50 million total investment including infrastructure.

GB200 economics reflect revolutionary capability at revolutionary cost. The Grace-Blackwell Superchip prices near $70,000, but system-level costs escalate quickly.⁴⁰ The GB200 NVL72 approaches $3 million per rack, making it among the most expensive computing systems ever mass-produced.⁴¹ Infrastructure costs add another 40-50% for power and cooling upgrades. A 1,000-GPU GB200 deployment approaches $200 million total investment.

Operational expenses shift the economic calculation. B200's 700W TDP translates to $2,500 annual power cost at $0.10/kWh industrial rates.⁴² GB200's 1,200W consumption increases annual power cost to $4,300 per chip. However, performance per watt improvements mean GB200 delivers lower cost per operation for suitable workloads. Large language model inference costs drop 70% on GB200 compared to B200 when accounting for total system throughput.⁴³

Depreciation schedules affect financial planning differently. B200 follows traditional three-year depreciation cycles with reasonable residual value. The evolutionary architecture ensures compatibility with future software and maintains relevance longer. GB200's revolutionary design risks faster obsolescence if programming models don't achieve widespread adoption. Conservative organizations apply accelerated two-year depreciation to GB200 investments, impacting project ROI calculations.

Real-world deployments illuminate decision factors

Amazon Web Services deploys both architectures strategically across their infrastructure. B200 powers the P6 instance family optimized for model training workloads.⁴⁴ Customers rent eight-GPU instances for $50-60 per hour, training foundation models without infrastructure investment. GB200 underlies specialized inference services where AWS manages complexity in exchange for premium pricing. The dual approach maximizes infrastructure utilization across diverse workloads.

Anthropic's Claude infrastructure relies heavily on GB200 for inference serving. The unified memory architecture enables efficient handling of context windows exceeding 200,000 tokens.⁴⁵ CPU preprocessing and caching reduce GPU utilization by 40% compared to pure GPU serving, enabling higher concurrent user counts. The company reports 5x improvement in cost per query after transitioning from H100 to GB200 infrastructure.

Tesla's Dojo team evaluated both architectures before choosing B200 for their next expansion phase.⁴⁶ The decision prioritized training throughput over inference optimization, as Tesla's workload focuses on video processing for autonomous driving. B200's pure GPU architecture delivers 20% better training performance per dollar for Tesla's specific models. The deployment adds 10,000 B200 GPUs to existing infrastructure without requiring facility modifications.

Government agencies show interesting deployment patterns. The U.S. Department of Energy selected GB200 for exascale computing initiatives where CPU-GPU integration enables new simulation capabilities.⁴⁷ Singapore's National Supercomputing Centre chose B200 for their shared infrastructure, prioritizing flexibility to serve diverse research workloads.⁴⁸ The split reflects different optimization priorities: capability versus capacity computing.

Migration strategies minimize transition risk

Organizations with existing H100 infrastructure find B200 migration straightforward. The same HGX form factor enables board-level swaps without rack modifications. Software stacks require minor updates for new tensor core instructions, but CUDA compatibility ensures most applications run without modification.⁴⁹ Introl's migration teams complete B200 upgrades during scheduled maintenance windows, achieving zero unplanned downtime across hundreds of deployments.

GB200 migration requires comprehensive planning spanning 6-12 months. Facility assessments identify power and cooling constraints requiring infrastructure upgrades. Software teams must refactor applications to utilize unified memory architecture effectively. The NVLink-C2C interconnect enables new programming patterns that require developer training. Organizations typically run parallel infrastructures during transition, maintaining production on existing systems while validating GB200 deployments.

Hybrid strategies emerge as practical compromises. Organizations deploy B200 for immediate capacity expansion while planning GB200 infrastructure for next-generation workloads. The approach maintains business continuity while building expertise with new architectures. Workload orchestration platforms automatically route jobs to optimal infrastructure based on characteristics: training to B200, inference to GB200. Introl helps clients design hybrid architectures that maximize both infrastructure investments.

Vendor lock-in concerns influence architecture selection. B200 maintains compatibility with the broader GPU ecosystem, enabling potential migration to AMD or Intel alternatives. GB200's proprietary NVLink-C2C and unified memory architecture create switching barriers that effectively lock organizations into NVIDIA's roadmap. Companies must balance performance benefits against strategic flexibility when committing to revolutionary architectures.

The decision framework for infrastructure teams

Workload analysis provides the clearest decision criteria. Pure training workloads favor B200's focused architecture and lower total cost. Mixed training and inference benefit from B200's flexibility and broad software support. Inference-dominated workloads justify GB200's premium through superior performance per query. Organizations must project workload evolution over the infrastructure's three-year lifecycle.

Facility constraints often make decisions regardless of workload preferences. Buildings with limited power capacity simply cannot support GB200 without major upgrades. Water availability restricts liquid cooling options in certain geographies. Existing lease terms may prohibit structural modifications required for 120kW racks. Physical reality overrides theoretical performance advantages.

Financial modeling must account for hidden costs. GB200's revolutionary architecture requires specialized expertise commanding 50% salary premiums.⁵⁰ Liquid cooling systems need dedicated personnel for water chemistry management. Complex deployments increase vendor support costs by 30-40%.⁵¹ Total cost of ownership calculations must include these operational factors beyond simple hardware and power costs.

Quick decision framework

Architecture Selection by Workload:

Infrastructure Requirements Comparison:

Key takeaways

For facilities teams: - B200: Uses existing H100 infrastructure (700W TDP, air or liquid cooling) - GB200: Requires 480V power, direct liquid cooling, $5-10M/MW retrofit cost - NVL72 requires 2,000+ cables per rack with exact routing specifications - Singapore moratorium partly stems from GB200 power demands

For architecture decisions: - Training: B200 delivers 23% faster Llama 3 405B training (Meta simulations) - Inference: GB200 serves 30x more concurrent users (OpenAI reports) - Memory: GB200 unified memory eliminates 50x CPU-GPU transfer penalty - Context: GB200 enables 200K+ token context windows efficiently

For financial planning: - B200 follows 3-year depreciation; GB200 may require accelerated 2-year - GB200 operational costs 40-50% higher (power, cooling, specialized staff) - Per-token inference costs 70% lower on GB200 for LLM workloads - NVIDIA lock-in risk higher with GB200's proprietary NVLink-C2C

Risk tolerance ultimately drives architecture selection. Conservative organizations choose B200's evolutionary path to minimize disruption. Aggressive competitors adopt GB200 to achieve breakthrough capabilities despite implementation challenges. The infrastructure decision reflects broader organizational strategy: optimize existing operations or transform business models through revolutionary capability.

References

1. NVIDIA. "NVIDIA Blackwell Architecture White Paper." NVIDIA Corporation, 2024. https://resources.nvidia.com/en-us-blackwell-architecture-whitepaper

2. ———. "GB200 Grace Blackwell Superchip: 30x Inference Acceleration." NVIDIA Corporation, 2024. https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/data-center/grace-blackwell-superchip/

3. IDC. "Worldwide AI Infrastructure Forecast, 2024-2030." International Data Corporation, 2024. https://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=US51892024

4. Huang, Jensen. "GTC 2024 Keynote: The Blackwell Platform." NVIDIA GTC, March 2024. https://www.nvidia.com/gtc/keynote/

5. TSMC. "4nm Process Technology Platform." Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, 2024. https://www.tsmc.com/english/dedicatedFoundry/technology/4nm

6. NVIDIA. "B200 Tensor Core GPU Specifications." NVIDIA Corporation, 2024. https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/data-center/b200/

7. ———. "Grace CPU Architecture and NVLink-C2C Technology." NVIDIA Corporation, 2024. https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/data-center/grace-cpu/

8. Chen, Tianshi, et al. "Energy-Efficient Deep Learning: A Comprehensive Survey." ACM Computing Surveys 56, no. 3 (2024). https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3639043

9. NVIDIA. "GB200 NVL72 System Design Guide." NVIDIA Corporation, 2024. https://docs.nvidia.com/gb200-nvl72-design-guide/

10. ———. "Liquid Cooling Requirements for Blackwell Systems." NVIDIA Corporation, 2024. https://docs.nvidia.com/datacenter/blackwell-cooling-guide/

11. JLL. "Data Center Retrofit Costs for AI Infrastructure." Jones Lang LaSalle, 2024. https://www.us.jll.com/en/trends-and-insights/research/data-center-retrofit-costs-2024

12. SK Hynix. "HBM3e: The Memory for AI Era." SK Hynix, 2024. https://www.skhynix.com/products/hbm3e/

13. MLPerf. "MLPerf Inference v4.0 Results." MLCommons, 2024. https://mlcommons.org/en/inference-datacenter-40/

14. NVIDIA. "Grace CPU Memory Subsystem Architecture." NVIDIA Corporation, 2024. https://developer.nvidia.com/grace-cpu-memory-architecture

15. Meta. "Memory-Constrained LLM Serving Optimization." Meta AI Research, 2024. https://ai.meta.com/research/publications/memory-constrained-llm-serving/

16. SemiAnalysis. "Blackwell Die Analysis: Tensor Core Allocation." SemiAnalysis, 2024. https://www.semianalysis.com/p/blackwell-die-analysis

17. Meta. "Llama 3 Training Infrastructure and Performance." Meta AI, 2024. https://ai.meta.com/blog/llama-3-training-infrastructure/

18. NVIDIA. "Inference Optimization on Grace Blackwell Superchip." NVIDIA Corporation, 2024. https://developer.nvidia.com/blog/gb200-inference-optimization/

19. OpenAI. "Scaling ChatGPT with GB200 Infrastructure." OpenAI, 2024. https://openai.com/research/scaling-chatgpt-gb200

20. NVIDIA. "NVLink Network Topology for B200 Systems." NVIDIA Corporation, 2024. https://docs.nvidia.com/nvlink/b200-topology-guide/

21. ———. "Fifth Generation NVLink Technology." NVIDIA Corporation, 2024. https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/data-center/nvlink/

22. ———. "GB200 NVL72: Single Logical GPU Architecture." NVIDIA Corporation, 2024. https://developer.nvidia.com/gb200-nvl72-architecture

23. ———. "Cable Management Guide for NVL72 Systems." NVIDIA Corporation, 2024. https://docs.nvidia.com/datacenter/nvl72-cable-management/

24. Amphenol. "Signal Integrity at 1.8TB/s: Cable Design Considerations." Amphenol Corporation, 2024. https://www.amphenol.com/docs/high-speed-cable-design-2024

25. Dell'Oro Group. "Data Center Switching Market Forecast 2024." Dell'Oro Group, 2024. https://www.delloro.com/data-center-switching-forecast-2024

26. LightCounting. "Optical Transceiver Market Analysis for AI Infrastructure." LightCounting, 2024. https://www.lightcounting.com/report/ai-infrastructure-optics-2024

27. Uptime Institute. "Data Center PUE Survey 2024." Uptime Institute, 2024. https://uptimeinstitute.com/2024-datacenter-pue-survey

28. Schneider Electric. "480V Power Distribution for High-Density Computing." Schneider Electric, 2024. https://www.se.com/us/en/download/document/480v-high-density-guide/

29. Black & Veatch. "Data Center Electrical Infrastructure Cost Guide 2024." Black & Veatch, 2024. https://www.bv.com/resources/2024-data-center-cost-guide

30. U.S. Energy Information Administration. "Average Residential Electricity Consumption." EIA, 2024. https://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.php?id=97

31. Singapore Economic Development Board. "Data Centre Energy Management Programme." EDB Singapore, 2024. https://www.edb.gov.sg/en/about-edb/media-releases/data-centre-energy-programme.html

32. Vertiv. "Grid-Interactive UPS Systems for Hyperscale Applications." Vertiv, 2024. https://www.vertiv.com/en-us/products/critical-power/grid-interactive-ups/

33. Motivair. "ChilledDoor Rear Door Heat Exchanger Specifications." Motivair Corporation, 2024. https://www.motivaircorp.com/products/chilleddoor/

34. NVIDIA. "Thermal Management Requirements for GB200 Systems." NVIDIA Corporation, 2024. https://docs.nvidia.com/datacenter/gb200-thermal-requirements/

35. Dow Chemical. "DOWTHERM Engineered Fluids for Electronics Cooling." Dow, 2024. https://www.dow.com/en-us/products/dowtherm-electronics-cooling

36. Nalco Water. "Data Center Cooling Water Treatment Programs." Ecolab, 2024. https://www.ecolab.com/nalco-water/solutions/data-center-cooling

37. Baltimore Aircoil Company. "Hybrid Cooling Tower Performance Data." BAC, 2024. https://www.baltimoreaircoil.com/products/hybrid-cooling-towers

38. Yandex. "Finland Data Center: Arctic Cooling Efficiency Report." Yandex, 2024. https://yandex.com/company/technologies/finland-datacenter

39. Dylan Patel. "AI Hardware Pricing Trends Q2 2024." SemiAnalysis, 2024. https://www.semianalysis.com/p/ai-hardware-pricing-q2-2024

40. ———. "Grace Blackwell Superchip Cost Analysis." SemiAnalysis, 2024. https://www.semianalysis.com/p/gb200-cost-analysis

41. HPCwire. "GB200 NVL72: The $3 Million Supercomputer." HPCwire, 2024. https://www.hpcwire.com/2024/gb200-nvl72-pricing/

42. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. "Data Center Energy Calculator v2.0." LBNL, 2024. https://datacenters.lbl.gov/tools/calculator

43. Anthropic. "Cost Per Token Analysis: GB200 vs B200 Deployment." Anthropic, 2024. https://www.anthropic.com/research/cost-per-token-infrastructure

44. Amazon Web Services. "EC2 P6 Instances with NVIDIA B200 GPUs." AWS, 2024. https://aws.amazon.com/ec2/instance-types/p6/

45. Anthropic. "Claude Infrastructure: Scaling to 200K Context." Anthropic, 2024. https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-200k-context-infrastructure

46. Tesla. "Dojo Expansion: B200 Deployment Decision." Tesla AI Day, 2024. https://www.tesla.com/AI-day-2024

47. U.S. Department of Energy. "Exascale Computing with Grace Blackwell." DOE Office of Science, 2024. https://www.energy.gov/science/articles/exascale-grace-blackwell

48. National Supercomputing Centre Singapore. "ASPIRE 2A: B200 System Announcement." NSCC, 2024. https://www.nscc.sg/aspire-2a-announcement/

49. NVIDIA. "CUDA Compatibility Guide for Blackwell Architecture." NVIDIA Corporation, 2024. https://docs.nvidia.com/cuda/blackwell-compatibility-guide/

50. Robert Half. "2024 Technology Salary Guide: AI Infrastructure Roles." Robert Half, 2024. https://www.roberthalf.com/salary-guide/technology/ai-infrastructure

51. Gartner. "AI Infrastructure Support Cost Benchmarks 2024." Gartner, Inc., 2024. https://www.gartner.com/en/documents/ai-infrastructure-support-costs-2024

SEO Elements

Squarespace Excerpt (159 characters)

B200 offers 2.5x H100 performance at 700W while GB200 Superchip delivers 30x inference speed at 1,200W. Compare power, cooling, and ROI for AI deployments.

SEO Title (59 characters)

NVIDIA B200 vs GB200: Complete Deployment & ROI Guide 2024

SEO Description (154 characters)

Compare NVIDIA B200 vs GB200 deployment requirements. Power consumption, cooling needs, memory architecture, and TCO analysis for AI infrastructure teams.

URL Slug Recommendations

Primary: nvidia-b200-vs-gb200-deployment-guide Alternative 1: b200-vs-gb200-comparison-roi-analysis Alternative 2: blackwell-gpu-deployment-b200-gb200 Alternative 3: nvidia-blackwell-infrastructure-guide