AI agent infrastructure: what autonomous systems require

Updated December 11, 2025

December 2025 Update: Agentic AI deployments multiplying token consumption 20-30x compared to standard generative AI. Gartner predicts 40% of agent projects will be canceled by 2027 due to infrastructure cost overruns. Memory architecture emerging as critical—agents require 3-5 year data retention for persistent context. LLM gateways and MCP (Model Context Protocol) becoming standard for multi-model orchestration across enterprise systems.

Nearly six in ten enterprises actively pursue agentic AI in 2025, deploying autonomous systems that coordinate workflows, call other models, and make decisions in real time.¹ Gartner predicts 33% of enterprise software applications will incorporate agentic AI by 2028, up from 0% in 2024.² With agentic AI, token consumption multiplies 20 to 30 times compared to standard generative AI, requiring proportionally more compute power.³ The infrastructure that supports chatbots and single-inference applications cannot scale to support autonomous agents operating continuously across enterprise systems.

The shift from prompt-response interactions to autonomous action creates fundamentally different infrastructure requirements. Agents need persistent memory across conversations, heterogeneous compute for orchestration and inference, and low-latency networking for inter-agent communication. Organizations deploying agents without purpose-built infrastructure will face escalating costs, performance bottlenecks, and reliability failures as workloads scale.

Compute requirements multiply

AI agents introduce complexity by requiring heterogeneous compute resources.⁴ CPU handles orchestration while GPU handles inference, often with different scaling patterns and utilization curves.⁵ The variable workload profile differs from the predictable patterns of batch training or synchronous inference.

The token multiplication creates substantial compute demand. Standard generative AI processes input tokens and returns output tokens in a single exchange.⁶ Agentic AI executes multi-step reasoning, tool calls, and coordination with other agents, generating 20 to 30 times more tokens per user interaction.⁷ The compute cost scales with token volume.

Running sophisticated AI agents requires significant computational resources, especially for complex reasoning tasks.⁸ The cost of LLM API calls, vector database storage, and cloud infrastructure escalates quickly for high-volume applications.⁹ Organizations must budget for substantially higher compute costs than their generative AI deployments currently incur.

GPU shipment projections from major suppliers grew more than fivefold for 2025 and 2026 as vendors scramble to meet escalating compute demand.¹⁰ Agentic AI contributes to this demand through continuous, coordinated inference calls that differ from the bursty patterns of training workloads.¹¹

Memory becomes architectural priority

Agentic AI requires persistent, long-term memory to retain past conversations, with storage requirements that will be very heavy and data retention spanning three to five years.¹² The storage demand exceeds generative AI by substantial margins.¹³

AI agents rely on both short-term and long-term memory to function effectively.¹⁴ Short-term memory works like computer RAM, holding relevant details for ongoing tasks or conversations.¹⁵ This working memory exists briefly within a conversation thread and is limited by LLM context windows.¹⁶

Long-term memory works like a hard drive, storing vast amounts of information for later access.¹⁷ This information persists across multiple task runs or conversations, allowing agents to learn from feedback and adapt to user preferences.¹⁸ The persistence requirement creates storage infrastructure needs that single-inference applications do not have.

Memory infrastructure for agentic systems requires tiered architecture: ephemeral cache for short-term working memory, hot storage for active episodes, and cold storage for archives.¹⁹ Co-locating compute and data reduces egress costs and latency.²⁰ The architectural pattern differs from the stateless design of most inference services.

Redis and similar in-memory databases provide the short-term memory that agents need for context within sessions.²¹ Vector databases store long-term memory for semantic retrieval. The combination creates a memory stack that must be purpose-designed for agent workloads.

Disaggregated architecture emerges

A promising architectural evolution involves disaggregating memory and compute resources specifically for inference workloads.²² Per-agent state memory dynamically provisions resources for each agent's context, reasoning steps, and interactions.²³ Treating model weights and agent states as separate memory categories enables more intelligent infrastructure provisioning.²⁴

Current resource allocation models poorly accommodate AI's variable memory needs, specialized compute requirements, and bursty utilization patterns.²⁵ Dedicated approaches struggle with capacity planning for unpredictable reasoning patterns.²⁶ Containerized environments face complex GPU and memory configurations.²⁷ Serverless models create cognitive disruptions from cold starts and execution limits.²⁸

The agentic AI mesh represents a composable, distributed, and vendor-agnostic architectural paradigm.²⁹ Multiple agents reason, collaborate, and act autonomously across systems through this infrastructure layer.³⁰ The architecture differs fundamentally from the static, LLM-centric infrastructure built for single-model inference.

Hybrid and multi-cloud AI infrastructure leverages public cloud elasticity with AI-optimized compute, storage, and networking that scales dynamically based on demand.³¹ Edge AI infrastructure addresses latency and privacy requirements for agents operating on user devices or in controlled environments.³²

Enterprise integration challenges

Many companies run on complex, decades-old infrastructure not designed to support autonomous AI agents.³³ Integration with legacy technology can result in brittle, expensive, and slow infrastructure.³⁴ Companies should use AI as a smart middleware layer translating between modern agent interfaces and legacy systems.³⁵

An LLM gateway acts as middleware between AI applications and foundation model providers, serving as a unified entry point.³⁶ Well-architected gateways abstract complexity, standardize access to multiple models and MCP servers, enforce governance, and optimize operational efficiency.³⁷

The model context protocol provides interoperability standards that break down silos as agents roll out across the technology stack.³⁸ Consistent standards enable frictionless integrations that capture the full value of agentic AI.³⁹ Organizations without interoperability standards will struggle to scale agents beyond isolated use cases.

Distributed AI infrastructure with powerful inference networks enables agents to operate where data resides.⁴⁰ Data storage, user interaction points, and action locations must all be distributed and interconnected for seamless real-time engagement.⁴¹ The distribution requirements exceed those of centralized inference services.

Governance and security requirements

Organizations must define and embed observability, security, governance, and controls providing traceability, accountability, anomaly detection, and cost discipline.⁴² For agentic AI to scale safely, these guardrails must be built in from the start rather than bolted on later.⁴³

Secure-by-design AI agent concepts require explicit ownership, least-privilege access, clear autonomy thresholds, and hard ethical boundaries.⁴⁴ Translating business objectives into these constraints requires deliberate architecture work that many organizations have not yet undertaken.

AI workloads require greater scalability and elasticity to handle the probabilistic nature of agentic systems.⁴⁵ Infrastructure must support rapid provisioning, specialized hardware, and low-latency, high-throughput network traffic for inter-agent communication.⁴⁶

The three-tier architecture approach progresses through Foundation, Workflow, and Autonomous tiers where trust, governance, and transparency precede autonomy.⁴⁷ Organizations that skip the foundational work will struggle with the reliability and security requirements of autonomous agents.

Scale projections and planning

Forecasts project AI agents will scale from 50 to 100 billion in 2026 to potentially 2 to 5 trillion by 2036.⁴⁸ The projection corresponds to 50 to 100 times the number of currently connected devices.⁴⁹ The scale creates infrastructure requirements that exceed anything current architectures support.

Power demand rises sharply with agent proliferation. GPU power use nearly doubled from about 400 watts in 2018 to almost 750 watts today and could exceed 1,200 watts by 2035.⁵⁰ The power trajectory compounds infrastructure challenges beyond compute and memory.

Gartner predicts 40% of agentic AI deployments will be canceled by 2027 due to rising costs, unclear value, or poor risk controls.⁵¹ The cancellation rate suggests that infrastructure planning failures will terminate otherwise promising initiatives. Organizations that build appropriate infrastructure from inception improve their odds of reaching production successfully.

Effective AI agents can accelerate business processes by 30% to 50%.⁵² Recent advances in computing power and AI-optimized chips reduce human error and cut employees' low-value work time by 25% to 40%.⁵³ The productivity gains justify infrastructure investment for organizations that execute effectively.

Infrastructure planning recommendations

Organizations planning agent deployments should evaluate infrastructure requirements before selecting use cases. The infrastructure capable of supporting pilots may not scale to production workloads. Building for scale from inception avoids expensive migrations.

Memory architecture requires particular attention. Agents that cannot persist state across sessions lose much of their value. Planning for multi-year data retention affects storage procurement and data governance.

Compute budgets should anticipate 20 to 30 times the token consumption of equivalent chatbot workloads. The multiplier may seem aggressive but reflects the multi-step reasoning that distinguishes agents from single-turn inference.

Integration architecture determines whether agents can access enterprise data and take meaningful action. Organizations should map integration requirements before committing to agent platforms. Legacy system integration often dominates implementation timelines.

Governance infrastructure cannot be deferred. Agents operating autonomously across enterprise systems require observability, access controls, and audit trails that must be designed into the architecture rather than added later.

The infrastructure bill for agentic AI is coming due.⁵⁴ Organizations that plan proactively will deploy agents successfully. Those that underestimate requirements will join the 40% predicted to cancel deployments before realizing value.

Key takeaways

For infrastructure architects: - Agentic AI multiplies token consumption 20-30x compared to standard generative AI; budget compute costs proportionally higher than chatbot deployments - Memory architecture requires three tiers: ephemeral cache (short-term), hot storage (active episodes), cold storage (3-5 year retention) - Disaggregated architecture emerging: separate model weights from per-agent state memory for intelligent resource provisioning

For platform engineers: - Redis and similar in-memory databases provide short-term memory; vector databases handle long-term semantic retrieval - LLM gateway acts as middleware between applications and foundation models: abstracts complexity, enforces governance, optimizes efficiency - Model Context Protocol (MCP) provides interoperability standards enabling frictionless tool integrations across the stack

For operations teams: - GPU power consumption nearly doubled from 400W (2018) to 750W today, projected to exceed 1,200W by 2035 - 40% of agentic AI deployments predicted to be canceled by 2027 from rising costs, unclear value, or poor risk controls - Define observability, security, governance, and cost discipline controls before deployment, not after

For capacity planners: - Agent scale projections: 50-100 billion agents in 2026 scaling to 2-5 trillion by 2036 (50-100x current connected devices) - Legacy system integration dominates implementation timelines; use AI as middleware translating between agent interfaces and legacy systems - Co-locate compute and data to reduce egress costs and latency; distribution requirements exceed centralized inference services

For strategic planning: - 60% of enterprises actively pursuing agentic AI in 2025; Gartner predicts 33% of enterprise software will incorporate agents by 2028 - Effective AI agents accelerate business processes 30-50% and cut low-value work time 25-40% - Three-tier architecture approach: Foundation, Workflow, Autonomous—trust, governance, and transparency must precede autonomy

References

1. Digital Commerce 360. "Companies rush toward agentic AI, but the infrastructure bill is coming due." November 2025. https://www.digitalcommerce360.com/2025/11/10/sp-agentic-ai-infrastructure-security/

2. Bain & Company. "Building the Foundation for Agentic AI." 2025. https://www.bain.com/insights/building-the-foundation-for-agentic-ai-technology-report-2025/

3. Computer Weekly. "Agentic AI to drive heavy infrastructure demands." 2025. https://www.computerweekly.com/news/366624332/Agentic-AI-to-drive-heavy-infrastructure-demands

4. Work-Bench. "The Future of Compute: How AI Agents Are Reshaping Infrastructure (Part 2)." 2025. https://www.work-bench.com/post/the-future-of-compute-how-ai-agents-are-reshaping-infrastructure-part-2

5. Work-Bench. "The Future of Compute (Part 2)."

6. Computer Weekly. "Agentic AI to drive heavy infrastructure demands."

7. Computer Weekly. "Agentic AI to drive heavy infrastructure demands."

8. Apideck. "AI Agents Explained: Everything You Need to Know in 2025." 2025. https://www.apideck.com/blog/ai-agents-explained-everything-you-need-to-know-in-2025

9. Apideck. "AI Agents Explained."

10. Arthur D. Little. "Giga scale: The AI infrastructure gold rush." 2025. https://www.adlittle.com/en/insights/viewpoints/giga-scale-ai-infrastructure-gold-rush

11. Arxiv. "When Intelligence Overloads Infrastructure: A Forecast Model for AI-Driven Bottlenecks." 2025. https://arxiv.org/html/2511.07265

12. Computer Weekly. "Agentic AI to drive heavy infrastructure demands."

13. Computer Weekly. "Agentic AI to drive heavy infrastructure demands."

14. BI Journal. "The Next Layer Of AI Infrastructure: Memory For Agentic Systems." 2025. https://bi-journal.com/the-next-layer-of-ai-infrastructure/

15. BI Journal. "The Next Layer Of AI Infrastructure."

16. BI Journal. "The Next Layer Of AI Infrastructure."

17. BI Journal. "The Next Layer Of AI Infrastructure."

18. BI Journal. "The Next Layer Of AI Infrastructure."

19. Work-Bench. "The Future of Compute: How AI Agents Are Reshaping Infrastructure (Part 1)." 2025. https://www.work-bench.com/post/the-future-of-compute-how-ai-agents-are-reshaping-infrastructure-part-1

20. Work-Bench. "The Future of Compute (Part 1)."

21. Redis. "Build smarter AI agents: Manage short-term and long-term memory with Redis." 2025. https://redis.io/blog/build-smarter-ai-agents-manage-short-term-and-long-term-memory-with-redis/

22. Work-Bench. "The Future of Compute (Part 2)."

23. Work-Bench. "The Future of Compute (Part 2)."

24. Work-Bench. "The Future of Compute (Part 2)."

25. Work-Bench. "The Future of Compute (Part 2)."

26. Work-Bench. "The Future of Compute (Part 2)."

27. Work-Bench. "The Future of Compute (Part 2)."

28. Work-Bench. "The Future of Compute (Part 2)."

29. Vamsi Talks Tech. "2025's AI Infrastructure Revolution: Where Agentic AI Meets Hardware Innovation." 2025. https://www.vamsitalkstech.com/ai/2025s-ai-infrastructure-revolution-where-agentic-ai-meets-hardware-innovation/

30. Vamsi Talks Tech. "2025's AI Infrastructure Revolution."

31. Akka.io. "Agentic AI frameworks for enterprise scale: A 2025 guide." 2025. https://akka.io/blog/agentic-ai-frameworks

32. Akka.io. "Agentic AI frameworks for enterprise scale."

33. McKinsey. "Seizing the agentic AI advantage." 2025. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/quantumblack/our-insights/seizing-the-agentic-ai-advantage

34. McKinsey. "Seizing the agentic AI advantage."

35. McKinsey. "Seizing the agentic AI advantage."

36. Akka.io. "Agentic AI architecture 101: An enterprise guide." 2025. https://akka.io/blog/agentic-ai-architecture

37. Akka.io. "Agentic AI architecture 101."

38. BCG. "How Agentic AI is Transforming Enterprise Platforms." 2025. https://www.bcg.com/publications/2025/how-agentic-ai-is-transforming-enterprise-platforms

39. BCG. "How Agentic AI is Transforming Enterprise Platforms."

40. Equinix Blog. "How Agentic AI Is Disrupting Systems of Record and Systems of Engagement." October 2025. https://blog.equinix.com/blog/2025/10/09/how-agentic-ai-is-disrupting-systems-of-record-and-systems-of-engagement/

41. Equinix Blog. "How Agentic AI Is Disrupting Systems."

42. InfoQ. "Agentic AI Architecture Framework for Enterprises." 2025. https://www.infoq.com/articles/agentic-ai-architecture-framework/

43. InfoQ. "Agentic AI Architecture Framework."

44. InfoQ. "Agentic AI Architecture Framework."

45. Akka.io. "Agentic AI frameworks for enterprise scale."

46. Akka.io. "Agentic AI frameworks for enterprise scale."

47. InfoQ. "Agentic AI Architecture Framework."

48. Arxiv. "When Intelligence Overloads Infrastructure."

49. Arxiv. "When Intelligence Overloads Infrastructure."

50. Arxiv. "When Intelligence Overloads Infrastructure."

51. Bain & Company. "Building the Foundation for Agentic AI."

52. McKinsey. "Seizing the agentic AI advantage."

53. McKinsey. "Seizing the agentic AI advantage."

54. Digital Commerce 360. "Companies rush toward agentic AI."

SEO Elements

Squarespace Excerpt (159 characters): Agentic AI multiplies token consumption 20-30x. 60% of enterprises pursue agents in 2025. Infrastructure requirements for autonomous AI systems and scaling.

SEO Title (55 characters): AI Agent Infrastructure: What Autonomous Systems Require

SEO Description (155 characters): Agentic AI multiplies compute 20-30x vs chatbots. 33% of enterprise apps will have agents by 2028. Analysis of memory, compute, and scaling requirements.

URL Slugs: - Primary: ai-agent-infrastructure-autonomous-systems-compute-requirements - Alt 1: agentic-ai-enterprise-deployment-architecture-2025 - Alt 2: autonomous-ai-agents-memory-compute-scaling - Alt 3: agentic-ai-infrastructure-cost-governance